Trisyllabic deletion

From English Wiki
Revision as of 03:51, 30 August 2019 by Kentlee7 (talk | contribs) (Created page with "Trisyllabic reduction or deletion is a phenomenon in English, in which a syllable is typically deleted in word of three or more syllables. For example, 'interest' is often pro...")
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Trisyllabic reduction or deletion is a phenomenon in English, in which a syllable is typically deleted in word of three or more syllables. For example, 'interest' is often pronounced as 'intrest' and 'chocolate' as 'choclate'. This occurrence depends of the following conditions:

  • The first syllable has the main stress, followed by two unstressed syllables.
  • The first syllable is usually a closed syllable, i.e., it has a consonant coda, i.e., it ends in a consonant or consonant cluster.
  • The first unstressed syllable is deleted.
  • Both unstressed syllables, and especially the deleted syllable, contain a schwa /ə/.
  • The deleted syllable usually precedes a more sonorant consonant, most often, /l/ or /r/.
  • This generally occurs in casual, colloquial, or fast speech.

That is:

  • Ś s s → Ś s


1 Modern English examples

2 Historical examples

This process has happened historically in English, such that some words were permanently shortened from Old English or Middle English, and it is the shortened words that mainly survive in modern English (or in a few cases, the shortened word survived alongside the original word, but with a different meaning). Here are a few examples (Lahiri & Fikkert, 1999, p. 232).[1]

original Old / Middle English word Modern English
webbestre webster
loppestre lobster
Gloucester Glouster
Leicester Leister
fantesie fancy
curte(i)sie curtsy
martinet martlet
perseli parsley
partener partner
vintener vintner
perchemin parchment
  1. Syncope of medial syllable Old and Middle English words. Lahiri, Aditi, & Fikkert, Paula. (1999). Trisyllabic shortening in English: past and present. English Language and Linguistics 3(2), 229-267.